Leicester deny player-power: Mahrez saga

Riyad Mahrez was AWOL for a week. In that time he missed training with teammates and two games. PF90 examines the frustrations – giving the lowdown on player-power along with implications for the world game

Mahrez’s legacy at Leicester is damaged, yet far from unrepairable. If they win the FA Cup and he scores the winner, all will be forgiven. Leicester could have cashed in on a reported £60 million for his sale to Manchester City, they would have made 150-times his original price of £400,000. He could now be worth more – or more likely less – this summer when he requests another move.

While showing their metal, the owners also revealed how much they value Mahrez. Chairman Vichai Srivaddhanaprabha has made two terrific statements. One against player-power, in essence his move denied his player’s attempt to ‘bully’ his release from contract. Another signal he has given is Leicester City will not bow to pressure from ‘bigger’ clubs.

Player-power is an interestingly ambiguous term, to be fair. Technically the players are hired commodities, even mercenaries. The way a business person would compartmentalise difficult decisions is befitting. For example, players move freely from team to team, embracing fans and culture to succeed: salary is always key.

However, there is a way to conduct transfer business with decorum to ensure player nor club is hurt. During the Mahrez-saga, both suffered grievances and possibly damaged reputations. Analysis of all information begins on the next page.