Copa Libertadores drama: Peñarol and Uruguay move to bar Botafogo fans right before semis
The latest decision by the Interior Minister of Uruguay, Nicolas Martinelli-to request a match with one single-fan base for the Copa Libertadores semifinal between Peñarol and Botafogo, the most prestigious soccer competition in South America-has set off an uproar in sports reporting and South American news. At the root of this controversy lie deep-seated concerns over safety and regulatory debates, in addition to the reverberation of violent scenes from the first match in Rio de Janeiro, which was blamed on the fans of Uruguay. There's palpable tension in the air, with repercussions reaching well beyond the fans into the heart of competitive balance.
Follow Playing for 90 on X (Twitter).
Single Fan Base: Safety or Setback?
On behalf of the Ministry of the Interior, Martinelli formally requested that the Uruguayan Football Association-AUF hold the rematch at the Campeón del Siglo this Wednesday without Botafogo fans. The reasoning is direct: after the clashes in Rio, ensuring visitor safety would be unfeasible.
This has brought on a lot of reflection related to the concept of "safety" in soccer. While the Ministry insists that it is putting fan safety first, critics see it as a blow in furthering the safety of all fans. A single-fan base, to many, adds fuel to the fire by creating the appearance of being in control when that is far from the bottom-line issue: preparing for the worst in major sporting events. And all this at a time when the game is just around the corner.
AUF y Conmebol en aguas turbulentas
AUF backed the minister's request, ratifying it with a note to avoid new disputes. Then Conmebol made a requirement to AUF and Peñarol for the presence of both sets of supporters, with written guarantees on safety measures. This entity, which in other cases was quite inflexible with regard to the fulfillment of the regulations, directly pressed the Uruguayan government under threat of an answer by 10 am local time this Wednesday.
It gives rise to questions of competence by the very Confederation in that game of ping-pong with the Uruguayan authorities. Giving them a chance to fix the problem of safety, Conmebol proves to be serious about fair play but risks its own credibility because, per the rule, a home club is wholly responsible for security.
Response by Botafogo: "A Dangerous Precedent"
The Brazilian side opposed this unilaterally decided measure, which it considered a "dangerous precedent." In a note released, the club accused Peñarol and the police of Uruguay of opening the way to a practice that clearly damages the spirit of the competition. Botafogo's arguments say that the inability to ensure safety in the stands ends up benefiting the home club when eliminating the visiting club's fans from the stands.
Strategically, Botafogo also turned to institutions such as Itamaraty and the Federal Police to help safeguard its fans already in Montevideo. This not only shows how much the Club is really concerned about its supporter's safety but also warns international authorities about the dangers of a decision that infringes at least on the most basic rule of reciprocity in soccer.
Who Pays the Bill? The Fans
But in this whole debate, the fans are the ones who take center stage, especially those 1,600 Botafogo supporters who have already bought tickets for the match and are already in Uruguay. For them, the uncertainty of access to the stadium is just an added frustration beyond the game itself. This incident has shown how some administrative decisions can have a serious direct impact on those fueling the spectacle: the fans.
For these fans, who have already shelled out for flights, lodging, and tickets, this borders on disrespect. Blocking the fans of Botafogo from entering the stadium would be a blow not only to them but also to the very essence of an international competition where cultural exchange and the camaraderie among rival sets of fans are part of the event. It was a mistake to slight the role of fans in the Copa Libertadores-a competition traditionally full of passion with big traveling sets of fans.
Conmebol
With its demand for formal security guarantees, Conmebol wants to appear as a mediator in search of fairness. Its leaders have already announced a threat to play that match without fans if those guarantees are not provided, much less take it to another venue. This intransigent position is notice served: teams that do not comply with security rules are subject to sanctions.