Former coach reignites feud with Real Madrid’s multi-championship legend

Klopp revisits 2018’s fiery tackle that sidelined Salah, questioning Ramos' ruthless mentality
UEFA Champions League"Real Madrid v Liverpool FC"
UEFA Champions League"Real Madrid v Liverpool FC" / VI-Images/GettyImages
facebooktwitterreddit

One of those unforgettable episodes from the 2018 Champions League, now alive once again in sports debates, thanks to none other than Liverpool coach and Red Bull Global Director Jürgen Klopp. During an interview on the podcast "Just Luppen" with former player Toni Kroos, Klopp referred to the old rivalry when discussing the infamous moment in which Real Madrid defender Sergio Ramos took Egyptian forward Mohamed Salah out of the game with an injury. That for many was a moment which influenced not only the game but perhaps even the outcome of that championship.

Follow Playing for 90 on X (Twitter).

Klopp's Ethical Dilemma: A Gentle Smack in Gloves?

When Klopp asks, "Is Mr. Sergio Ramos really a nice guy?", he goes to the core of the discussion. This is not only an isolated tackle, a hard foul, or an unexpected injury; this is about some players' mentality that, in his opinion, would stop at almost nothing to win.

This, coming from a coach who is never short on candor, is a jab-but so subtle in tone, considering Ramos over the years has built a reputation as a ruthless player, bordering on unsportsmanlike conduct for some. Klopp's words seemed to underscore a line he will not cross, a line he feels Sergio Ramos will not hesitate to step over. The message is clear: there's a line between competition and dirty play, and no trophy in the world is worth crossing it.

The Pivotal Moment: Klopp and the Loss of Salah

As one reflects back on that moment, Salah was the most feared name in Liverpool's attack, and he was in outstanding form. Real Madrid knew that controlling Salah was critical to controlling Liverpool. But just how that neutralization came to be is what has been debated to this very day. Early in the match, a tussle involving Ramos and Salah finished with the injured shoulder of the latter and his exit from the pitch. To many people, that image was a shock not only to Liverpool but to soccer as a whole.

On his part, Ramos scoffed at the incident. He then said it was Salah who first grabbed him, and that if Salah had invaded the field, he could have kept on playing. That seemed hard and to many, a provocation. He thus seemed to state again the image of a "tough" defender, with Klopp left under the burden of defeat and watching his top player getting sidelined in the season's most crucial moment.

Sergio Ramos: Hero or Villain?

It was an episode that cemented Ramos's reputation as arguably the most contentious, divisive defender in the world. To many Real Madrid fans, he is the hero, the captain-the guy who will stop at nothing to win. To many others, he is the villain, a player who epitomizes a "win-at-all-costs" mentality.

These comments by Klopp restart that debate, going to the heart of what is expected from an athlete-to wit: should a defender intimidate his opponent to such a point that he risks physical harm? It's a thin line separating determination from violence, and Klopp seems of the opinion that Ramos has crossed this line more than once. He even said that whenever he saw such players on his teams, he made sure to move them out, underlining his own vision of the ideal competitive spirit.

Klopp vs. Ramos: Two Styles, Two Worlds

There is no denying it: Klopp and Ramos represent two philosophies, poles apart. Klopp has always spoken of wanting a dynamic, attacking game where respect for opponents is paramount. Ramos, though, is an intense sort of modern gladiator. Both of them have achieved success and collected titles, but the clash of their philosophies seems inevitable.

To Klopp, soccer should be a fight all right, but a clean one where the best win without sidelining opponents. Perhaps to Ramos, the line that separates playing tough from playing dirty isn't that inflexible. It's the difference in their perspective that keeps the 2018 episode alive as a symbol of something more: two kinds clashing in an endless duel, the verdict far from unanimous.

feed