Tottenham transfer analysis: Was loaning out Vincent Janssen a mistake?

LONDON, ENGLAND - APRIL 08: Vincent Janssen of Tttenham Hotspur gives his team mates a thumbs up during the Premier League match between Tottenham Hotspur and Watford at White Hart Lane on April 8, 2017 in London, England. (Photo by Michael Regan/Getty Images)
LONDON, ENGLAND - APRIL 08: Vincent Janssen of Tttenham Hotspur gives his team mates a thumbs up during the Premier League match between Tottenham Hotspur and Watford at White Hart Lane on April 8, 2017 in London, England. (Photo by Michael Regan/Getty Images) /
facebooktwitterreddit

Harry Kane is the only Tottenham striker with a goal

Tottenham believed they’d secured a massive upgrade over Vincent Janssen when they purchased Fernando Llorente on Deadline Day. Given the fact that the Spaniard has yet to score for Spurs, it’s fair to wonder whether or not the club made the right decision by loaning Janssen to Fenerbahce.

In reality, this is quite a difficult question to answer. By any means of evaluation, Janssen suffered through a disastrous first campaign at Tottenham. It’s hard to imagine a backup striker being less effective given an entire season to provide cover for Harry Kane.

Unfortunately, it’s not impossible to imagine such a scenario. Fernando Llorente’s start to the 2017/18 campaign has brought the idea to life. The venerable Spaniard hasn’t opened his Spurs account with a goal through his first 264 minutes of action.

It’s more than Llorente’s lack of scoring that bothers me. It’s the lack of anything else he provides the squad. He’s almost worthless on the pitch unless he’s providing a real goal scoring threat. The fact that he only appears dangerous with his head only adds to his limitations.

That’s a sharp contrast to the way Janssen played. There’s no question he missed some incredible scoring chances, but you could never question his effort or energy level. Janssen was a tireless worker. He gave his teammates a lift with his excellent hold up play and his willingness to run hard on the press. Llorente has yet to contribute to his teammate’s success by either of those avenues.

More from Tottenham Hotspur

Even so, the question we’ve set out to answer isn’t whether or not Janssen would be better than Llorente. Instead, the issue is whether or not jettisoning Janssen to Turkey was the right call. To that question, I must offer a reluctant yes.

It’s clear that Pochettino was never going to trust the Dutch hitman after such an ineffective season. Right or wrong, the Argentine gaffer is decisive when he makes his mind up about a player. His gut call is usually correct, but it leaves little gray area for his players. Janssen clearly was on the wrong side of his manager.

Approving of the Janssen decision doesn’t mean I approve of the Llorente signing. I understood the logic of the move when it happened, but it clearly hasn’t paid off. Some fans might hold out hope for a turnaround Llorente given his track record of success, but I can’t say that I share such optimism. To me, he looks to be a poor fit for the way Pochettino likes to play.

Next: Tottenham midfield in disarray after Leicester debacle

The conclusion here is that Tottenham still don’t have a quality backup for Harry Kane. The club may elect to give Llorente a full season to fill the role, but adding another forward in January is a distinct possibility. Sending Janssen out on loan was the right move, but Spurs didn’t buy the right player to replace him.