The UEFA Champions League is on the cusp of dramatic transformation. As it grows to 36 teams, the tournament is entering a new era, not only marked by the quantity of participating clubs but also by the increasingly growing U.S. market interest in European soccer. With the 2026 World Cup set to take place in the United States, Canada, and Mexico, and the 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles, the U.S. is continuing to establish itself as a global sports destination.
Follow Playing for 90 on X (Twitter).
UEFA and the ECA have both observed this trend and have begun exclusive discussions with Relevent Sports, one of the largest soccer promoters in the United States, The Independent says. The goal is to sell the global commercial rights to UEFA club competitions from 2027, along with hosting matches in the U.S., further advancing European soccer's push into the U.S. market.
Can globalization in sport be seen as a positive thing?
The globalization of sport is nothing novel, but never more evident than it is today. The drive to break borders is no longer simply a matter of preseason friendlies or one-off tournaments on American shores. With a possible commercial deal on the horizon, the Champions League could be even more accessible to American audiences, with increased investment in broadcasts and commercial activations specific to this market.
This begs one huge question: what does this change foretell for the players and, more importantly, the European clubs?
The redesigned Champions League promises additional games, more excitement, and more income. However, this introduction of extra games does not come without an expense. The players already are contending with congested schedules, juggling commitments between domestic leagues, cup competitions, and international tournaments. Including additional rounds would have a tangible physical effect, raising the prospect of injuries while decreasing the standard of play overall. Aside from that, mental exhaustion of playing at the top level all the time might have a direct consequence on team performances.
Matches on another continent might be detrimental to players
The discussions between UEFA, ECA, and Relevent Sports could be a sign of things to come for world soccer. The United States market is now a driver of the sport's development, and the European clubs do not want to be left behind. The Premier League is already seeing the rewards of this movement, with television contracts in the United States becoming more lucrative.
Phase two could include adapting the Champions League to try to attract even more American fans. This could result in new promotion, preseason friendlies in the U.S., and even fixture adjustments to better fit prime-time television in North America.
With an already crowded schedule, however, the journey across the Atlantic for a competitive match could take a toll on players. Clubs would have to change to cope with the increased number of games. The physical demands would be inevitable, and teams that do not rotate their squads sufficiently could be severely punished. Injuries could become even more prevalent, and the level of soccer could suffer if players arrive exhausted at the most critical stages of the tournament.
Meanwhile, the supporters in Europe are watching these events with a certain amount of trepidation. The Champions League tradition could be sacrificed on the altar of commercialism, and the integrity of the competition could take second place to the quest for new markets.
Tradition and modernization have to be balanced
Soccer has always been driven by passion, rivalries, and moments of history. The Champions League is the absolute best of that sensation, with legendary matches and never-to-be-forgotten comebacks. But the modernization of the tournament ushers in an important question: how much can globalization influence soccer before it ceases to be authentic?
The growing U.S. interest in the sport can be a windfall, but it presents a challenge as well: how much stress can clubs and players endure in an already punishing calendar?